Hiroshi SHIBATAandClaude Opus 5 9b2f743a76 [ruby/rubygems] Use Process.last_status instead of $? ...

Ruby::Box leaves $? uninitialized, so status checks read success after a failing command. Under RUBY_BOX=1 this made Gem::Source::Git#rev_parse swallow rev-parse failures and the release tool carry on with empty output.

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/22280

https://github.com/ruby/rubygems/commit/67147d48a1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-15 05:08:53 +00:00

..

git.rb

[ruby/rubygems] Use Process.last_status instead of $?

2026-09-15 05:08:53 +00:00

installed.rb

[rubygems/rubygems] standardize pretty-print output for Gem::Source and subclasses

2024-09-03 17:40:12 +00:00

local.rb

[ruby/rubygems] Support content addressable gems in gem install

2026-09-06 23:25:48 +00:00

lock.rb

util/rubocop -A --only Layout/EmptyLineAfterMagicComment

2023-03-23 17:18:49 +09:00

specific_file.rb

[rubygems/rubygems] standardize pretty-print output for Gem::Source and subclasses

2024-09-03 17:40:12 +00:00

vendor.rb

util/rubocop -A --only Layout/EmptyLineAfterMagicComment

2023-03-23 17:18:49 +09:00