mirror of
https://github.com/authelia/authelia.git
synced 2026-10-28 09:34:52 +08:00
130 lines
7.2 KiB
Markdown
130 lines
7.2 KiB
Markdown
<!--
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Authelia
|
|
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
# Security Policy
|
|
|
|
## Prologue
|
|
|
|
The __Authelia__ team takes security very seriously. Because __Authelia__ is intended as a security product a lot of
|
|
decisions are made with security being the priority and we always aim to implement security by design.
|
|
|
|
## Policy
|
|
|
|
1. Reports that include a severity rating must use the CVSSv4 rating system.
|
|
2. Reporters that use Generative Artificial Intelligence in any part of discovery of a vulnerability, providing
|
|
information about a vulnerability, providing a proof-of-concept for a vulnerability, or providing a suggested fix
|
|
to a vulnerability must abide by the [Artificial Intelligence Policy]. This includes abiding by the conversational
|
|
area of the repository rule which effectively only allows using it to generate code, and full disclosure of the use
|
|
of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Please read the full [Artificial Intelligence Policy] for more information.
|
|
3. Reporters that are aware of specific requirements to trigger a vulnerability such as configurations or architectures
|
|
should include this information in their report.
|
|
4. The report and interactions in the report are subject to the [Code of Conduct].
|
|
|
|
**_Translation:**_ You may use artificial intelligence to perform translation but it must be strictly follow the
|
|
policy around translations which is located in the [Translation Section of the Artificial Intelligence Policy].
|
|
|
|
## Coordinated vulnerability disclosure
|
|
|
|
__Authelia__ follows the [coordinated vulnerability disclosure] model when dealing with security vulnerabilities. This
|
|
was previously known as responsible disclosure. We strongly urge anyone reporting vulnerabilities to __Authelia__ or any
|
|
other project to follow this model as it is considered as a best practice by many in the security industry.
|
|
|
|
If you believe you have identified a security vulnerability or security related bug with __Authelia__ please make every
|
|
effort to contact us privately using one of the [contact options](#contact-options) below. Please do not open an issue,
|
|
do not notify us in public, and do not disclose this issue to third parties.
|
|
|
|
Using this process helps ensure that users affected have an avenue to fixing the issue as close to the issue being
|
|
made public as possible. This mitigates the increasing the attack surface (via improving attacker knowledge) for
|
|
diligent administrators simply via the act of disclosing the security issue.
|
|
|
|
## Contact Options
|
|
|
|
Several contact options exist however it's important you specifically use a security contact method when reporting a
|
|
security vulnerability or security related bug. These methods are clearly documented below.
|
|
|
|
### GitHub Security
|
|
|
|
Users can utilize GitHub's security vulnerability system to privately [report a vulnerability]. This is an easy method
|
|
for users who have a GitHub account.
|
|
|
|
### Email
|
|
|
|
Users can utilize the [security@authelia.com](mailto:security@authelia.com) email address to privately report a
|
|
vulnerability. This is an easy method of users who do not have a GitHub account.
|
|
|
|
This email address is only accessible by members of the [core team] for the purpose of disclosing security
|
|
vulnerabilities and issues within the __Authelia__ code base.
|
|
|
|
### Chat
|
|
|
|
If you wish to chat directly instead of sending an email please use one of the
|
|
[chat options] to direct / private message one of the [core team] members.
|
|
|
|
Please avoid this method unless absolutely necessary. We generally prefer that users use either the
|
|
[GitHub Security](#github-security) or [Email](#email) option rather than this option as it both allows multiple team
|
|
members to deal with the report and prevents mistakes when contacting a [core team] member.
|
|
|
|
The [core team] members are identified in [Matrix] as room admins, and in [Discord] with the `Core Team` role.
|
|
|
|
## Process
|
|
|
|
1. The user privately reports a potential vulnerability.
|
|
2. The report is acknowledged as received.
|
|
3. The report is reviewed to ascertain if additional information is required. If it is required:
|
|
1. The user is informed that the additional information is required.
|
|
2. The user privately adds the additional information.
|
|
3. The process begins at step 3 again, proceeding to step 4 if the additional information provided is sufficient.
|
|
4. The vulnerability is reproduced.
|
|
5. The vulnerability is patched, and if possible the user reporting the bug is given access to a fixed binary, docker
|
|
image, and git patch.
|
|
6. The patch is confirmed to resolve the vulnerability.
|
|
7. The CVE identifier is requested and assigned.
|
|
8. The following steps are completed at the same time:
|
|
- The [security advisory] is published as an initial public disclosure which includes the impact and brief details of
|
|
the vulnerability, mitigation instructions, severity, and a brief summary. This disclosure is also published by
|
|
[MITRE] and [NIST] etc. This initial public disclosure may
|
|
not include all information:
|
|
1. That was disclosed during the private disclosure process.
|
|
2. That is necessary to reproduce the vulnerability.
|
|
- The patch is swiftly merged into the codebase and a release is cut. The commit includes a clear reference to the
|
|
CVE identifier.
|
|
9. The [security advisory] is updated with any additional information that was otherwise not disclosed in the
|
|
initial public disclosure roughly 7 days after the release.
|
|
|
|
## Credit
|
|
|
|
Users who report bugs will at their discretion (i.e. they do not have to be if they wish to remain anonymous) be
|
|
credited for the discovery. Both in the [security advisory] and in our
|
|
[all contributors] documentation.
|
|
|
|
## Help wanted
|
|
|
|
We are actively looking for sponsorship to obtain security audits to comprehensively ensure the security of _Authelia_.
|
|
As security is really important to us we see this as one of the main financial priorities.
|
|
|
|
We believe that we should obtain the following categories of security audits:
|
|
|
|
* Code Security Audit / Analysis
|
|
* Penetration Testing
|
|
|
|
If you know of a company which either performs these kinds of audits and would be willing to sponsor the audit in some
|
|
way such as doing it pro bono or at a discounted rate, or wants to help improve _Authelia_ in a meaningful way and is
|
|
willing to make a financial contribution towards this then please feel free to contact us.
|
|
|
|
[MITRE]: https://www.mitre.org/
|
|
[NIST]: https://www.nist.gov/
|
|
[coordinated vulnerability disclosure]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_vulnerability_disclosure
|
|
[security advisory]: https://github.com/authelia/authelia/security/advisories
|
|
[report a vulnerability]: https://github.com/authelia/authelia/security/advisories/new
|
|
[core team]: https://www.authelia.com/policies/governance/#core-team
|
|
[all contributors]: https://github.com/authelia/authelia/blob/master/README.md#contribute
|
|
[Artificial Intelligence Policy]: https://www.authelia.com/policies/artificial-intelligence/
|
|
[Translation Section of the Artificial Intelligence Policy]: https://www.authelia.com/policies/artificial-intelligence/#translation
|
|
[Code of Conduct]: https://www.authelia.com/policies/code-of-conduct/
|
|
[Matrix]: https://www.authelia.com/information/contact/#matrix
|
|
[Discord]: https://www.authelia.com/information/contact/#discord
|
|
[chat options]: https://www.authelia.com/information/contact/#chat
|