mirror of
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.git
synced 2026-10-28 13:45:38 +08:00
Patrick Ohly
06bf5ee606
Reasons for removing it:
- Having to deal with this part of the PR template is additional work and/or
causes confusion ("I initially put the release note in the docs section by
mistake.").
- Contributors typically don't know what to put there, reducing its usefulness.
- When contributors stop reading past that section they miss the AI disclosure section.
My subject impression is that this section is not used or not used correctly.
To verify, I ran an analysis of the PRs that went into 1.37.
- No docs code block at all: 497 PRs (43.4%) — e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/136271
- Empty docs block (blank/only comment): 453 PRs (39.5%) — e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/117119
- docs block = only a placeholder (N/A/None/-): 105 PRs (9.2%) — e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129079
- docs block = a single KEP link: 64 PRs (5.6%) — e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134639
- docs block = multiple KEP links, nothing else: 15 PRs (1.3%) - e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/138759 (three KEP links)
- docs block = KEP link(s) plus other non-KEP info (Usage docs, etc.): 5 PRs (0.4%) — e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/140052 (KEP + sysctl Usage doc)
- docs block = other info, no KEP link at all: 7 PRs (0.6%) - e.g. http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/140033 (note about a docs typo fix)
This was first suggested on
Slack (https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C2C40FMNF/p1788427548615859) two
weeks ago, with no objections and several people supporting the proposal.
2.6 KiB
2.6 KiB
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR is related to:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?