mirror of
https://github.com/RustPython/RustPython.git
synced 2026-10-28 18:59:04 +08:00
There aren't any tests but being able to do nested for loops seems like a pretty big win to me so I'm going to put up for review. The original returned boolean clearly had **false positives** for detecting bad errors for things like nested `if` and `for` statements. What is less clear is if there are any **true positives** which I am no longer catching with the updated return value. Co-authored-by: Jack O'Connor <jack@jackoconnor.dev>