diff --git a/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py b/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py index 4c128f770..15c3a6ebe 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ # of much interest anymore), and a few were fiddled to make the output # deterministic. -from test.support import sortdict +from test.support import sortdict # noqa: F401 import doctest import unittest @@ -34,22 +34,21 @@ class defaultdict(dict): if key not in self: self[key] = other[key] - test_1 = """ Here's the new type at work: >>> print(defaultdict) # show our type - + >>> print(type(defaultdict)) # its metatype >>> a = defaultdict(default=0.0) # create an instance >>> print(a) # show the instance {} >>> print(type(a)) # show its type - + >>> print(a.__class__) # show its class - + >>> print(type(a) is a.__class__) # its type is its class True >>> a[1] = 3.25 # modify the instance @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@ just like classic classes: >>> print(sortdict(a.__dict__)) {'default': -1000, 'x1': 100, 'x2': 200} >>> -""" +""" % {'modname': __name__} class defaultdict2(dict): __slots__ = ['default'] @@ -137,10 +136,10 @@ instance variables cannot be assigned to: >>> a.default = -1 >>> a[1] -1 - >>> a.x1 = 1 + >>> a.x1 = 1 # TODO: RUSTPYTHON; # doctest: +EXPECTED_FAILURE Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? - AttributeError: 'defaultdict2' object has no attribute 'x1' + AttributeError: 'defaultdict2' object has no attribute 'x1' and no __dict__ for setting new attributes >>> """ @@ -265,19 +264,19 @@ implicit first argument that is the *class* for which they are invoked. ... print("classmethod", cls, y) >>> C.foo(1) - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 >>> c = C() >>> c.foo(1) - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 >>> class D(C): ... pass >>> D.foo(1) - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 >>> d = D() >>> d.foo(1) - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 This prints "classmethod __main__.D 1" both times; in other words, the class passed as the first argument of foo() is the class involved in the @@ -293,18 +292,18 @@ But notice this: >>> E.foo(1) E.foo() called - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 >>> e = E() >>> e.foo(1) E.foo() called - classmethod 1 + classmethod 1 In this example, the call to C.foo() from E.foo() will see class C as its first argument, not class E. This is to be expected, since the call specifies the class C. But it stresses the difference between these class methods and methods defined in metaclasses (where an upcall to a metamethod would pass the target class as an explicit first argument). -""" +""" % {'modname': __name__} test_5 = """ @@ -465,18 +464,18 @@ called A.foo() called A.foo() """ -# TODO: RUSTPYTHON -__test__ = {# "tut1": test_1, - # "tut2": test_2, - # "tut3": test_3, - # "tut4": test_4, +__test__ = {"tut1": test_1, + "tut2": test_2, + "tut3": test_3, + "tut4": test_4, "tut5": test_5, "tut6": test_6, "tut7": test_7, "tut8": test_8} def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern): - tests.addTest(doctest.DocTestSuite()) + from test.support.rustpython import DocTestChecker # TODO: RUSTPYTHON + tests.addTest(doctest.DocTestSuite(checker=DocTestChecker())) # TODO: RUSTPYTHON return tests